[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

(fwd) I am a shithead, Windows 95 rules



Found this sad e-mail on comp.os.linux.announce.

Path: miriam.fuller.edu!psinntp!psinntp!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!fido.news.demon.net!demon!news2.euro.net!wirehub!xs4all!basement.replay.com!mail2news-gw
From: liw@iki.fi (Lars Wirzenius)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.announce,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: I am a shithead, Windows 95 rules
Date: 1 Mar 1997 16:31:45 +0100
Organization: mail2news@replay.com
Approved: liw@iki.fi
Message-ID: <news3sdiury283@aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: basement.replay.com
X-XS4ALL-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 16:31:48 MET
X-To: mail2news@utopia.hacktic.nl
X-Mail2News-Errors-To: postmaster@replay.com
Lines: 34
Xref: miriam.fuller.edu comp.os.linux.announce:2664 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:80977 comp.os.linux.advocacy:67078

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


This is your moderator speaking.

I decided to step down because I have installed Windows 95
and have found it awesome. Its applications like MS Word, MS Access,
and MS Excel are far superior to whatever exists on Linux.
Plus, the world is quickly converting to Windows and Windows NT
(anotehr fine operating system) and Unix is quickly becomeing
a legacy.

As they say, 40 million Windows users cannot be wrong. If we
believe in free markets, Windows has won.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i

Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMxdRoIQRll5MupLRAQFDkQP/aB4wzTkfmhNT21sKbBLosQOlnoRoI4bM
X6nzDd2QKPcnE5TqNRpxRPQ3lNS2BhkI5ScLlwOrMQ/pNLoaa/26/v57sS48llD9
DKfFiUiOhxOOnbI4EzG5tsivQ10SjYQK35mNx1yIg/w1GZ4b2rizvMQ49pfhfDZV
LpW5MjwX7A8=
=f2li
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Read <http://www.iki.fi/liw/mail-to-lasu.html> before you mail me.
Please don't Cc public replies to me.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
     *** This is posted via the replay mail2news gateway: ***
     * No attempt was made to verify the sender's identity. *


Reply to: