Re: libdl1 problems

[David Engel <david@sw.ods.com>]

On Feb 28, Brian C. White wrote
> Several packages depend upon "libdl1 (>=...)" and is not being properly
> handled by dselect.

I don't see any packages which list a libdl1 version.  If there are
any, I don't know where they got it.

> Would it be prudent to change the ldso package so that the .shlibs file
> it provides has the line:
> 
> 	libdl   1       ldso
> 
> instead of:
> 
> 	libdl   1       libdl1
> 
> It might not be as accurate, but since it's an automatically generated
> dependancy, it should still work.

Since there are no longer any plans for glibc to provide libdl1, this
can be done easily.  Let me know.

David
-- 
David Engel                        ODS Networks
david@sw.ods.com                   1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081