Re: teTeX
On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Richard Kaszeta wrote:
> I do have a question about the new teTeX packages:
>
> I don't the the copyright information include is correct (the
> tetex-base I just downloaded from 'bo' had the GPL in there). While
> this is true for most of the stuff, I am certain it is not the case
> for the entire package (although if this is not the case it is the
> fault of the upstream maintainer, Thomas Esser)
You are right. IMHO not everything is "free" and some parts have to be
placed in non-free.
Perhaps we should make a package "tetex-nonfree" that contains these files
and which is placed in non-free? I would like to see all the tetex*
packages it non-free!
Cheers,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@debian.org,
! ___; schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de, bm955877@muenchen.org
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: teTeX
- From: Chow Chi-Ming <cmchow@se.cuhk.edu.hk>
- References:
- teTeX
- From: Richard Kaszeta <kaszeta@me.umn.edu>