Re: ppp & pam (was: Re: ppp's ip-{up,down} and possible utilization of 'run-parts')

[James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>]

Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> writes:

> > I thought that, until I noticed that libpam depends upon
> > libpam-util, which depends upon libpwdb0, which together come to
> > about 180k compressed.
> 
> I think you should file a bug report against libpam so it doesn't
> depend on libpam-util.  I don't see why a library package should
> depend on a binary one.

I think you should look at pam before making statements like that.

-- 
James


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .