Re: bashisms
adrian.bridgett@zetnet.co.uk (Adrian Bridgett) wrote on 27.11.97 in <19971127191644.62378@wyvern>:
> There are alot of scripts which use unnecessary bashisms. Apart from complex
> scripts most of these can be easily changed to conform to the POSIX shell.
> This has the added advantage of meaning that those who want to can use ash
> as /bin/sh and reap the benefits of improved performance.
Hmmm ... I remember someone claiming that ash _isn't_ a POSIX shell?
MfG Kai
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: