firstname.lastname@example.org (Adrian Bridgett) wrote on 27.11.97 in <19971127191644.62378@wyvern>:
> There are alot of scripts which use unnecessary bashisms. Apart from complex
> scripts most of these can be easily changed to conform to the POSIX shell.
> This has the added advantage of meaning that those who want to can use ash
> as /bin/sh and reap the benefits of improved performance.
Hmmm ... I remember someone claiming that ash _isn't_ a POSIX shell?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .