Re: revised proposed solution (was Re: Bug#15859: libc6 in stable is horribly broken)
On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, David Engel wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 1997 at 01:06:07AM -0500, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> > > Would it? What if they would also upgrade their libc5-dev to the same
> > > version as the libc5 in hamm? Would that help? In the past these two
> > > packages always had to have the same version, AFAIK.
> >
> > The problem is that libc5-dev doesn't exist in hamm. Hamm has
> > libc5-altdev instead. This forces people who want to compile libc5 stuff
>
> So find someone to modify the libc5 in hamm to build both -dev and
> -altdev packages. It isn't that hard.
Trust me, if I thought I was competant enough to do so, I would. However,
I don't trust myself not to break such an important package.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: