Re: version numbers on virtual packages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
> I was going to change perl to perl5 think weekend and just provide the
> virtual package perl. This would close a bug filed by Brian White who
> is worried about Perl6. While I was thinking about this during builds
> of Perl, I realized that I can't do that right now. The problem? dpkg
> doesn't support versions on virtual packages. Too many things depend on
> a specific version of Perl to just tell people to fix things up.
> What does everyone else think?
If perl6 is not going to be ready for Debian 2.0, I think it is too soon
to worry about.
The Breaks: field could be another (nicer, IMHO) solution for this.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .