Re: Selling Artistic License Software (WAS: Re: non-DFSG section and CD distributers)

To: James Troup <J.J.Troup@comp.brad.ac.uk>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Selling Artistic License Software (WAS: Re: non-DFSG section and CD distributers)
From: Stephen Zander <srz@mckesson.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 13:08:33 -0800
Message-id: <m0xZ0JV-000023C@debian>
Reply-to: stephen.zander@interlock.mckesson.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "18 Nov 1997 18:44:19 GMT." <dmm90umf3ek.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>

James Troup wrote:
> (There's probably more than that, I still haven't checked even half of
> all the sections); ee, and patch are perl-free.

Considering who wrote patch, it's not suprising that it's under the
Artistic Licence :)


Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Selling Artistic License Software (WAS: Re: non-DFSG section and CD distributers)
  - From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@comp.brad.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Open Hardware Program
Next by Date: Re: Red Hat 5.0 Release date
Previous by thread: Re: Selling Artistic License Software (WAS: Re: non-DFSG section and CD distributers)
Next by thread: Re: Selling Artistic License Software (WAS: Re: non-DFSG section and CD distributers)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread