Re: Selling Artistic License Software (WAS: Re: non-DFSG section and CD distributers)
Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> By reading the DFSG and the current Artistic License, it is clear that we
> need an "Artistic License, version 2".
To what end? Perl itself is distributed under both Artistic and GPL.
Most of the code I've seen in CPAN is dirstributed "under the same
terms as perl."
Are there any non-perl packages in Debian under the artistic licence?
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: