Re: The chronoilogicallly ordered bug pages
Santiago Vila Doncel <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I disagree. The system works well as it is, with the last message in the
> > bug thread often providing a useful overview of the action so far.
> Obviously you didn't read my message with
> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 22:03:31 +0100 (CET), did you?
> There are *a lot* of examples in which the last message says *nothing*.
> Please, read *all* the mails about this bug #14572 before disagreeing.
I've seen all the messages about this, and you presented examples only to
illustrate your point. In my experience, the current ordering works well.
I maintain my opposition to any change.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .