Re: x locking vs. ssh
Raul Miller wrote:
> > Is there a better way?
Joey Hess <email@example.com> wrote:
> Here's something a friend of mine wrote that ignores the lock files
> and just checks what ports are currently in use starting at port 6000,
> until it finds a free port, and then it outputs the corresponding
> display. I don't know if this will work perfectly all the time, but
> it's worked fine for me.
That will fix the immediate problem, but not the general problem.
I was hoping for something that would detect a unix socket only server
as well as a tcp only server.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .