[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: emacs20



> Once I've got X 3.3-6 uploaded, I'm going to take a shot at packaging
> emacs 20.1, which just came out.  Since emacs 20 is a beta (like emacs
> 19 was before about 19.20 or so) people will likely want them to
> coexist, at least for a while.
> 
> Thus, my plan is to package up "emacs20_20.1-1" for now, and do the
> update-alternatives thing as needed.  That seems clearly enough the
> right thing to do.  However, I'd also like to, later on when emacs20
> is stable and "replaces" emacs 19, like emacs 19 has replaced emacs 18
> for a couple of years now, put out an *emacs* package that is emacs 20
> (that also happens to conflict/replace the emacs20 package...)  Does
> that make sense?  Will the xemacs packages do the same thing wrt
> xemacs19 vs 20?  Or are they just going to diverge and keep the number
> in the name?

You could also keep the name in there, but at some point make the emacs20
package "Replaces: emacs19".



-- 
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: