Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 16 Sep 1997 16:59:50 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87wwkgapih.fsf@slip-97-9.ots.utexas.edu>
In-reply-to: Jim Pick's message of Tue, 16 Sep 1997 14:36:58 -0700
References: <[🔎] 199709162137.OAA29622@fleming.jimpick.com>

I think I'm going to go with `oldlibs'.  Names like deprecated,
legacy, and obsolete, all imply too much.  These packages are all ok
to use; they are just for libc4 and libc5.


Guy


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?
  - From: ioannis@flinet.com

References:
- Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>

Prev by Date: Re: To doc or not to doc, that's the question. (long RFC)
Next by Date: Re: To doc or not to doc, that's the question. (long RFC)
Previous by thread: Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?
Next by thread: Re: New ftp section for libc[45] - what to call it?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread