Re: FTP site organization
Brian White <email@example.com> writes:
This sounds like an excellent idea. A couple of thoughts:
> really the problem anyway, so long as they will also fit into the
> proposed logical structure. My problems stem mostly from what
> "Filename:" value is in the "Packages" file.
> - All "Packages" files will give the "Filename:" field relative start with
Why not start the Filename: as relative to the directory from which
the Package file comes from. Then downloaders can do something like:
and then get
for the files they require.
>  this directory will be empty in most places, but provides a convient
> "mount-point" for those who combine the distributions elsewhere
What about other <what are we calling these things: non-free/non-us
etc>, why do we need the mount-point on the main server (although it
can usefully contain a README explaing the problems)?
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .