Re: Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name

To: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name
From: Richard Kaszeta <kaszeta@me.umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 21:20:34 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 199709110220.VAA03342@bofh.me.umn.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199709110150.SAA02980@fleming.jimpick.com>
References: <[🔎] 199709110150.SAA02980@fleming.jimpick.com>

Jim Pick writes ("Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name"):
>We've got zillions of tetris and tetris-like games.  What should we
>relabel/rename them as?  T*tris, tetris-like, ???

Tetrish  :)

-- 
Richard W Kaszeta 			Graduate Student/Sysadmin
bofh@me.umn.edu				University of MN, ME Dept
http://www.menet.umn.edu/~kaszeta


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>

References:
- Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>

Prev by Date: Re: libfoo package depends on libfoog package?
Next by Date: Re: libfoo package depends on libfoog package?
Previous by thread: Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name
Next by thread: Re: Tetris packages - need a less-trademarked name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread