Re: egcs (New GCC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 17 Aug 1997, Galen Hazelwood wrote:
> Rob Browning wrote:
>
> > Vincent Renardias <vincent@waw.com> writes:
> >
> > > one more is probably not a problem, as long as it Provides:,
> > Conflicts:
> > > with the other packages correctly.
> >
> > It would be really nice if we could have gcc and egcc installed
> > concurrently. Then it would be easy to check suspected problems in
> > each compiler's behavior against the other. It would also make gcc an
> >
> > easy fallback for cases that egcc doesn't initially handle well.
>
> This is actually quite easy to do. Just rename egcc's frontend to
> "/usr/bin/egcc" or something like that, and they coexist wonderfully.
Another suggestion would be to install it similar to the way we do altgcc,
in a seperate directory path that can be placed first. Perhaps stick it
in /opt, since that would seem to be what opt is for anyway.
- --
| You are never given a wish without also
Scott K. Ellis | being given the power to make it true.
storm@gate.net | You may have to work for it, however.
| -- Illusions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM/cqR6Ck2fENdzpVAQF3pwP/RxFjmh/lMBHq3u23P5eV0/ByL4Mp+gOj
WqsTFfSasGkPlfvKmch+ahFiACFEJb1FN34nXk57sh/tNiZCssd7oZkvLqUojSjj
GLArG+g5FNGEPffnK2+l8MCGK5Q/2zFP3Ou0cMSxc/0myqgxIaV0PU+pbmia8l23
briQYqgU3vQ=
=f/iH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: