Re: Hosed my debian system.
Brandon Mitchell <bhmit1@mail.wm.edu> writes:
> Would anyone disagree to a statically linked /sbin/sh. It doesn't have
> to be bash. The idea is to have it for emergencies, and paranoid admins
> would use it for the root shell. (i.e. when /bin/sh blows up, move
> /bin/sh to /bin/sh.bak and ln -s /sbin/sh /bin/sh.)
We've already been over this argument many times. It's pointless to
have staticly linked binaries because there are always more binaries
that are important. A much better solution is a rescue floppy.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: