Re: Should packages depend on cron?
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997, Bill Mitchell wrote:
> On 23 Jul 1997, Emilio Lopes wrote:
>
> > [...] I forgot to write: the (an)cron jobs
> > cron.daily etc should be run at high nice (6 or so), so that they
> > won't be noticed.
>
> I think someone made the point several days ago that niceing cron
> jobs doesn't do much good if they're disk-intensive, as they tend
> to be. Niced or not, they'll still clog up the disk-access bottleneck
> and slow down everything else which needs to access the disk.
I asked a while back on deb-user if anyone was working on a program that
came with an rc5 or des challenge. It think it was called lwatch. It
keeps track of the system load, and if it goes above a certain level (say
1.5), it will put a process to sleep until the system load is below a
different level (say 0.2). Maybe we should call it mega nice :-) Anyway,
I think it's being packaged with some enhancements. Once it is done,
maybe we should consider using it.
Question for an anacron expert (sorry, I don't use it myself): can
anacron be fooled into thinking a job was last run at a time earlier than
it really was. This could be used for resinking the weekly and monthly
jobs (since anacron would only be called daily and after a reboot, daily
jobs aren't a problem).
Sounds like cron might be getting a face lift :-)
Brandon
-----
Brandon Mitchell E-mail: bhmit1@mail.wm.edu
Homepage: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/7877/home.html
"We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds."
--Linus Torvalds
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: