Re: Proposal: /etc /usr/etc /usr/local/etc
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Boris D. Beletsky wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Vadim wrote:
>
> Vadim> > Just a matter of taste, as it seems: (a) it seems to me
> Vadim> > quite elegant, (b) why does it disturb you to change libc ?
> Vadim> > it always evolve; it's just natural IMO (c) and so ? let's
> Vadim> > make it a cpp macro... if we make it at all ;)
> Vadim>
> Vadim> If we add it into libc, we'll lose the compatibility with
> Vadim> other Unices. Making it a macro is really a good idea I didn't
> Vadim> think of.
>
> Other Linuces you mean,
There are also i386-based Unices that can do iBCS.
> anyway (;-)) macro sound good to me,
> anything is better then putting the function in every src-pkg.
Yeah, a very nice solution. Although it's a little harder to
implement, because anyway this function requires some static storage.
Maybe we might use malloc, though. But putting { } (blocks) in a
macro isn't possible, as far as I know. We need { } anyway, regardles
of wether we use malloc.
Vadik.
--
Vadim Vygonets * vadik@cs.huji.ac.il * vadik@debian.org * Unix admin
The fish doesn't think, because the fish knows... everything.
-- Arizona Dream
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: