[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ddd?



> Do we have two ddd packages? I just saw an upload of ddd_2.1.1-1 together
> with binaries ddd-smotif and ddd-dmotif. However, there's already a 2.1.1-1
> version in the archive (using lesstiff). So I take it we have two packages
> with the same name.

That's not just the same name, that's the same package compiled against
lesstif and motif respectively. The reason I (ddd-dmotif and ddd-smotif
maintainer) uploaded source is because uploads of ddd (with lesstif)
to main distribution and motif packages to contrib are going to be
completely independent. Unfortunately, even motif versions of ddd-2.x
are not stable enough. I will definitely end up uploading ddd-1.4d
which is much more stable. 
My question is whether I should make these packages
(ddd-2.x and ddd-1.4d) non-conflicting with each other (using different
name for binary, say gddd, different .dddinit files, etc.) or shouldn't.


Thank you.

Alex Y.

> 
> Michael
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager    | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
> meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
> meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
> Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire!             | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> Use Debian GNU/Linux!                  | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10

-- 
   _   
 _( )_
(     (o___
 |      _ 7                              '''
  \    (")                              (O O)
  /     \ \         +---------------oOO--(_)--------------------+
 |    \ __/   <--   | Alexander Yukhimets   aqy6633@is5.nyu.edu |
 |        |         |       http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/      |
 (       /          +-------------------------oOO---------------+
  \     /                              |__|__|
   )   /(_                              || ||
   |  (___)                            ooO Ooo
    \___)


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: