[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Use of suidmanager



It seems I misunderstood what suidmanager does.

But I still don't see the reason for non-setuid  programs listed there
by default. Does that mean 'You can make this program suid, but we
prefer it to be not-suid.'?

Michael

--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager    | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire!             | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux!                  | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Christoph Lameter [SMTP:clameter@waterf.org]
>Sent:	Tuesday, June 24, 1997 4:51 PM
>To:	Michael Meskes
>Cc:	Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject:	RE: Use of suidmanager
>
>On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>>But that means we have to add all permission since all are configurable.
>>Isn't it a better idea to save the standard setting only for those
>>programs that are setuid by default?
>
>I am not sure that I understand this.
>
>/etc/suid.conf contains permission for suid candidates in order to make it
>easy to give those files suid status by simply editing the file.
>
>entries in suid.conf also will cause the preservation of those permissions
>across updates.
>
>--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
>
>
>--
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
>Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: