RE: checker libs with debugging symbols
True. But I didn't say 'get rid of these symbols'. All I'd like to see
is the chance for me to install a version without symbols.
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
email@example.com | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
firstname.lastname@example.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
>From: Thomas Koenig [SMTP:email@example.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 1997 10:33 AM
>Cc: Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject: Re: checker libs with debugging symbols
>Michael Meskes wrote:
>>Sorry but I disagree here. For a user who only wants to debug his own
>>program debugging symbols in the libraries are not needed.
>Let's take a look at the following program:
> char buffer;
> return 0;
>If you feed it a line that's too long, the access violation will
>happen deep within the C library. Without debugging symbols, it's
>hard to know wether this is a bug in the C library (and there
>could be quite a few :-) or your program.
>Thomas Koenig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, firstname.lastname@example.org.
>The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .