[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Copyright question

> On 31 May 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> > A program I am packaging has a copying policy as follows:
> > 
> >   Only NON-COMMERCIAL distribution allowed.
> This puts the package into non-free. However...
> > Redistribution of
> >   modified versions by other people than myself is not allowed.
> We need at least the possibility to distribute a modified binary version
> of the package. If this isn't allowed by that sentence, than the package
> can't be included in the archive at all. Or do I miss something?

Yes, if a modifying the package isn't allowed, then it cannot go
into the main archive, and has to go into non-free, even if you're
allowed to make money distributing it.

Non-free it is

joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: