Re: [Fwd: Re: dpkg question]
On Sat, 10 May 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>
> Lawrence> Well, it looks like you will need to keep one source for
> Lawrence> both of them. However, since they are from 2 different
> Lawrence> sources, I am not sure it would be in accord with debian
> Lawrence> policy. Current situation is definitely unacceptable,
> Lawrence> since we want our packages to build as they are without
> Lawrence> the strange setup currently required.
>
> Why aren't sources packed into a single archive, the way rpms files
> are?
Maybe we could have dpkg-source -b to 'ar' the 3 source files?
The fact sources are in 3 files is IMHO not the 'right thing'.
(Although reasonable people may disagree ;)
Cordialement,
--
- ** Linux ** +-------------------+ ** WAW ** -
- vincent@debian.org | RENARDIAS Vincent | vincent@waw.com -
- Debian/GNU Linux +-------------------+ http://www.waw.com/ -
- http://www.debian.org/ | WAW (33) 4 91 81 21 45 -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: