Re: 1.3 install report
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 14 Apr 1997, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 1996, Philippe Troin wrote:
> >  Texinfo is still in bo and is selected by default (I think).
> > Texinfo will have to be removed in order to have tetex installed. The
> > texinfo package should be removed from bo as its functionality is
> > implemented by tetex-base.
> But there may be people who want to use texinfo to make info files,
> not tex files. Why must they install tex at all?
> It would be better to extract a tetex-texinfo package from tetex-base,
> that replaces/conflicts with texinfo, wouldn't it?
I agree. One thing Debian does well is being modular. tetex packages are
too monolithic. This split would be good for Debian modularity.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Santiago Vila <email@example.com>