> > >You wouldn't by any chance have 'adpkg' installed instead of 'dpkg', > >would you? > > Yup, that's it. I do have it installed, but forgot about it. In fact I > do not know exactly what adpkg is. > > Michael For the record, this one got me too. The unstable distribution is certainly living up to it's name. :-) Cheers, - Jim (sorry, no PGP, I went on vacation and forgot my pass phrase... doh)