Re: Xv 3.10a-11 (i386) uploaded to master

[Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com>]

> NO NO NO. This is why lynx, Netscape et al are taking 30 secs to start 
> up - there are so many testndisplays to do that the process stops in 
> its tracks while it sorts it out. 

Please do some profiling and convince us of that -- I don't
particularly believe it (mostly because lynx *doens't* take that long
to start anyway. Of course, lynx is screwed anyway because it goes
through the list backwards. (D'oh!))  Are you sure you don't have some
*other* problem [testndisplay might be slow because it's not a
builtin, but test -n $DISPLAY was practically *free* since test is
interpreted directly by any /bin/sh we actually use...)