Re: What I found with initial installs
On Mar 5, Chris Fearnley wrote
> 'email@example.com wrote:'
> >So we got that going, then another nasty. We wanted perl, which means you
> >delete perl-base as they conflict, we also wanted ldso for some dependancies
> >(which provides libdl). But perl predepends libdl and you can get in an
> >awful bind as almost everything wants perl. The solution here was to leave
> >everything in hold, get ldso and install and then run dselect again.
> This is fixed in ldso_1.8.10-2.deb.
No, this doesn't fix anything, yet. The change in ldso just makes it
possible to work around the bug in dpkg/dselect. All of the packages
which depend on libdl1 still need to be rebuilt so dpkg-shlibdeps will
make them depend on ldso instead.
David Engel ODS Networks
firstname.lastname@example.org 1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400 Richardson, TX 75081