Re: Possible framework for `debmake replacement'
Andy Mortimer <email@example.com> writes:
> The core of this package would be the helper program(s), which for the
> sake of this proposal will be a set of programs with the prefix
Maybe it would be less, uh, clutterful (is that a word?), to have all
of these as separate programs, possibly in /usr/lib/dmake, while
having a single program, dmake, that acts as the "controller"?
The user could, if he or she wanted to, call the programs directly,
but would be encouraged to use dmake and a variety of flags.
I don't know if anyone cares, but I think having a zillion little
scripts may be as bad as having one big one.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com