Proposal regarding Bruce's proposal.
> Regarding Bruce's proposal of having upstream maintainer signing their
> packages, here's a first proposal:
> It doesn't cover completly the problem, but I think it's a necessary
> first step.
> As usual, feel free to comment/improve/... _(;
Unfortunately, security protocol design (which is what you are doing)
is seriously non-trivial.
I'm sorry to say that your proposal has serious flaws; for example, it
makes no provision for checking the integrity of the upstream
maintainer's public key.
I strongly suggest that you leave this kind of thing to someone with
more experience of such things. Crypto and security stuff is _very_
easy to get wrong in a way that's not obvious - after all, if you
write an ordinary bug in your code users will complain, but noone
complains about security problems until the horse has bolted.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com