[ Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list. ] "Richard G. Roberto": > So the "distributions are: > > stable, unstable, contrib, non-US and non-free? Yes. > Why don't we just "freeze" the "bo related" distributions as they > are when the time comes and when bo's successor is implemented > create the new directory structure then That's probably the best way to do it. > Ahhh. So there will be two points at the root level -- stable > and unstable? And non-US, non-free, and contrib. These symlinks should all remain at the top level and should point at directories below stable -- people who want unstable versions can to dig below the codename directory. And the Debian-x.x and Debian-x.x.x links as well. > fixed (still needed?) fixed is still needed. > Still not quite clear on this but I think I'm getting warmer ;-) Yes, I hate it when it's above 0 degrees Celsius and your feet get all wet. -- Please read <http://www.iki.fi/liw/mail-to-lasu.html> before mailing me. Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list.
Attachment:
pgp9uw_RBojYe.pgp
Description: PGP signature