On Sun, 15 Dec 1996, Lars Wirzenius wrote: liw >A qmail-package like netscape-package might be appropriate. liw > liw >OTOH, I've been led to understand that the qmail authors don't liw >really want it to be distributed in any form until it's finished liw >(version 1.0). While it certainly sounds like a really, really liw >good program (compared to security-hole-per-week sendmail), perhaps liw >we should be polite and wait for the final release? Or at least liw >ask the authors if they oppose a packager package. Could the qmail expert in our midst advise us? --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- PGP Public Key = FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33 C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5
Attachment:
pgpZitPEqK7TQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature