Re: Bug#5217: idled defaults are very aggressive

To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>
Cc: rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#5217: idled defaults are very aggressive
From: Mark Eichin <eichin@cygnus.com>
Date: 04 Nov 1996 01:49:38 -0500
Message-id: <xe1ybgiz75p.fsf@maneki-neko.cygnus.com>
In-reply-to: Christoph Lameter's message of Fri, 1 Nov 1996 13:34:16 -0800 (PST)
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961101133028.20591A-100000@waterf.org>

> If you want to customize the behavior of idled then read the
> documentation.

Umm, I *can't* read the documentation until after idled is
installed...  I used to have a similar problem with diald (which may
have been fixed, or maybe other things I've done have just broken it
enough that it doesn't try to do anything :-)  Isn't there something
in the policy guide about this? If not, shouldn't there be?

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#5217: idled defaults are very aggressive
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@waterf.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Eli copyright - too restrictive?
Next by Date: Bug#5190: vim doesn't use bottom line of screen in an xterm
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#5217: idled defaults are very aggressive
Next by thread: Re: Bug#5217: idled defaults are very aggressive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread