Re: stability of non-free?
On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Yves Arrouye wrote:
> We definitely have to do something regarding this problem.
> I think that non-free is definitely part of the Debian system, and favors option 1 (free/non-free inside the debian stable/unstable hierarchy).
> What do you think ?
>
I disagree. The whole purpose of non-free is to divorce those packages
from the distribution. Non-free has nothing to do with stable vs unstable.
It has to do with the distribution restrictions that are placed on the
packages that it contains.
Luck,
Dwarf
------------ --------------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net
------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: