[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: stability of non-free?

On Mon, 28 Oct 1996, Yves Arrouye wrote:

>    We definitely have to do something regarding this problem. 
>    I think that non-free is definitely part of the Debian system, and favors option 1 (free/non-free inside the debian stable/unstable hierarchy).
>    What do you think ?
I disagree. The whole purpose of non-free is to divorce those packages
from the distribution. Non-free has nothing to do with stable vs unstable.
It has to do with the distribution restrictions that are placed on the
packages that it contains.



------------                                          --------------

aka   Dale Scheetz                   Phone:   1 (904) 877-0257
      Flexible Software              Fax:     NONE 
      Black Creek Critters           e-mail:  dwarf@polaris.net

------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to: