Re: stability of non-free?
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996 13:38:54 +0100 Christian Schwarz
(schwarz@monet.m.isar.de) wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> So perhaps we should create reorganize our filesystem (ftp):
>
> stable/free/binary.....
> source
> non-free/binary.....
> source.....
> unstable/...
>
> But if we consider non-free stuff _NOT_ as part of the Debian system, we
> should propable do the following:
>
> stable/binary
> source (as now)
> non-free/stable/binary
> source
> unstable/binary
> source
We definitely have to do something regarding this problem.
I think that non-free is definitely part of the Debian system, and favors option 1 (free/non-free inside the debian stable/unstable hierarchy).
What do you think ?
Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: