Bug#4972: jed should be in unstable/ /editors not in non-free

To: "Boris D. Beletsky" <borik@isracom.co.il>, 4972@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#4972: jed should be in unstable/ /editors not in non-free
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 26 Oct 1996 02:43:55 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87n2xanpac.fsf@slip-98-6.ots.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>, 4972@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: "Boris D. Beletsky"'s message of Sat, 26 Oct 1996 07:43:47 +0200 (IST)
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.961026073918.6752A-100000@sim.dot.org.il>

"Boris D. Beletsky" <borik@isracom.co.il> writes:

> jed_0.98b-*.deb
> should be in
> unstable/binary-i386/editors

You've sent me four messages in the last three days about this, and
now you file a bug against it?  (against the wrong package - btw,
should be ftp.debian.org)

Teraga, anee yagea le ze.

Guy

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#4972: jed should be in unstable/ /editors not in non-free
  - From: "Boris D. Beletsky" <borik@isracom.co.il>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#4947: dpkg doesn't handle complex Replaces properly
Next by Date: Re: sed problems: Inserting a line at the FIRST match only
Previous by thread: Bug#4972: jed should be in unstable/ /editors not in non-free
Next by thread: fetchmail: anyone working on it?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread