Bug#4696: Incorrect font files generated
> I've been told that this is so, and the the DC copyright is too
> restrictive for Debian to put it into the main distribution
> (instead it goes to non-free). However, I have not had time to
> check this, so this is just a rumor.
>
> Rainer, do you know what the situation with the copyright is?
> A confirmation, either way, would be nice.
The author of dcfonts wants to have a copy when his work is brought
out on cdrom, and wants to be notified before you do this. See the
package copyright file for more info.
> Since I write a fair amount of text in both Finnish and Swedish
> (the languages of my parents), which both require the DC fonts,
> this affects me directly.
Don't you want to install stuff from non-free or?
Erick
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
>From miss
Received: from mongo.pixar.com (138.72.50.60)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 1996 07:12:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 13820 invoked from smtpd); 7 Oct 1996 07:03:00 -0000
Received: from primer.i-connect.net (HELO primer) (bruce@206.139.73.13)
by mongo.pixar.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 1996 07:02:54 -0000
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 09:02:24 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Juergen Menden <menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: Debian development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#4674: ppp postinst bugs (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961007090047.27092H-100000@koma.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"YFY361.0.qL3.JrAMo"@primer>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/374
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
sorry, the nameserver problems hit me... :-)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 17:11:29 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Juergen Menden <menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#4674: ppp postinst bugs
On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Dirk.Eddelbuettel@qed.econ.queensu.ca writes:
> >
> > I find the run_ppp = 0 solution a la xdm the easiest.
>
> I absolutely agree with Dirk on this.
i do not. suggest following scenario: a new pppd comes out, which
has a severely different cmd-line interface. therefore the init.d
script has to be changed. dpkg doesn't this by default, because
the file is edited and asks the unaware user to confirm.
simply provideing the script in /etc/init.d/ without the links in
/etc/rc?.d/ makes this easier.
> IMO the best way is to ask in the
> postinst whether or not to start ppp.
but here i agree. ask the user whether or not the links in
/etc/rc?.d should be created. :-)
jjm
--
Juergen Menden | Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by me,
tel: +49 (89) 289 - 22387 +-----------+ are (usually) not the opinions
e-mail: menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de | of anyone else on this planet.
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: