Re: Shadow vss PAM
Patrick Weemeeuw writes:
> Thinking things over again, and considering that the shadow support
> for Debian is almost finished (as far as I know, only xdm and a few
> small utilities such as vipw have to be adapted for shadow support), I
The actual situation is that we have to make xdm and adduser shadow aware.
That's about it. Some minor changes to the shadow packages may have to be
done, too. BTW we now have shadow vipw/vigr thanks to the work of Miquel.
> would propose to go for shadow for 1.2. In the mean time, I will try
> to make a few applications PAM-aware, to wet my feet and to gain some
> insight about how simple or complex things are. After all, it's not a
> black or white thing, but we can PAMify application by application.
Sounds good to me.
Michael Meskes | _____ ________ __ ____
firstname.lastname@example.org | / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___ __________
email@example.com | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
firstname.lastname@example.org | ___/ / __/ /__ __/\__, / __/ / (__ )
Use Debian Linux! | /____/_/ /_/ /____/\___/_/ /____/