Re: Shadow vss PAM
Patrick Weemeeuw writes:
> I have the feeling that an awful lot of work is being duplicated here.
But then almost the complete work has already been done.
> All of the work being done to support shadow password files, will have
> to be done over again to support PAM. Also, IMHO the PAM framework is
> superior, as it supports shadow password files among others (give or
> take maybe a few options particular to the shadow package actually
> used).
What exactly does it offer that shadow doesn't?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | _____ ________ __ ____
meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de | / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___ __________
meskes@sanet.de | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
meskes@debian.org | ___/ / __/ /__ __/\__, / __/ / (__ )
Use Debian Linux! | /____/_/ /_/ /____/\___/_/ /____/
Reply to: