Re: psutils and pipes bug
On Thu, 30 May 1996, Mike Coleman wrote:
> The problem seems to be one or both of: (1) a change in the way psutils
> decides whether a file is seekable or not, and (2) libc's (possibly changed)
> optimization of fseeks.
> Specifically, the current version of psutils decides whether a file is
> seekable by SEEK_CUR with 0 as the arg (which is a no-op seek to the current
> position), checking to see whether this generates an error. Libc, however,
> optimizes this fseek away (i.e., without calling lseek), and doesn't generate
> an error.
> The attached patch seems like a reasonable fix. It tests seekability by
> seeking to EOF and back to the current point, checking for errors.
> (I'm also Cc:'ing Angus (author of psutils) on this.)
> P.S. One of the debian.* files mentions firstname.lastname@example.org as the package
> maintainer. Is this really the same as email@example.com or a typo?
Mike, let me know which file/package has the bad address in it. I thought
I had found them all.
The correct address is firstname.lastname@example.org
Thanks for the patch. I will try it soonest. I had just about decided that
the seek was the place to look, 'cause I new there had been changes in
this area of pipes. You saved me a lot of grubbing around. I appreciate
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: email@example.com
------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------