Re: underscores
bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens) wrote on 25.05.96 in <[🔎] m0uNYzy-0007hIC@mongo.pixar.com>:
> package-name_1.2.3_i386.deb
Looks good enough to me.
> The upload processing script would strip off the architecture name when
> moving the file into the architecture-specific directory, so that the
> result would look like this:
>
> package-name_1.2.3.deb
That one, however, is unclear to me.
Why do we need two versions of the file name? Well, three, counting the
8+3 version, but I know what that one is for :-)
Why not simply leave the name as-is? It seems to me that would reduce
possible confusion and even make those scripts simpler.
MfG Kai
Reply to: