Re: Bug#3063: sudo executable not readable?
Christian Hudon writes:
> But you've got a really good point. There's no point in making the binary
> 4711 when everyone can get the source.
Okay, I see the point. to be honest the arguments on debian-devel against it
were much better than the ones on sudo-workers why to have it this way.
I'll close the bug and prepare a new upload (as soon as I'm in the office).
> Maybe these could be put in the guidelines as an explanation of the 4755?
> Would cut down (a tidbit) on the number of debian-devel posts and make
> paranoid people happier.
Yes, that would help. And I'd also like to see some explanation about the
Should packages in admin be 'standard'?
Michael Meskes | _____ ________ __ ____
| / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___ __________
email@example.com | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
| ___/ / __/ /__ __/\__, / __/ / (__ )
Use Debian Linux! | /____/_/ /_/ /____/\___/_/ /____/