forwarded message from debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
Another mangled bug, against `elvis' this time.
------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
Return-Path: <debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org>
Received: from vega.netg.se ([194.52.205.3]) by chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
with smtp id m0uJsas-0002aPn
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.35); Thu, 16 May 96 03:15 BST
Received: (from smartlst@localhost) by vega.netg.se id DAA04218
(8.6.13/IDA-1.6 for ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk); Thu, 16 May 1996 03:18:55 +0200
Message-ID: <199605160118.DAA04218@vega.netg.se>
References: <m0uJrgC-0002aPC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m0uJrgC-0002aPC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: junk
From: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
To: ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Bug#3013: elvis is too granular and has short description
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 03:18:55 +0200
WARNING:
Please try to use 'debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org'
the next time when issuing (un)subscribe requests.
24898 debian-devel@pixar.com
debian-devel@afp.com
You have been removed from the list.
If this wasn't your intention or you are having problems getting yourself
unsubscribed, reply to this mail now (quoting it entirely (for diagnostic
purposes), and of course adding any comments you see fit).
Transcript of unsubscription request follows:
- --
>From iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk Thu May 16 03:18:45 1996
>Return-Path: <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
>Received: from pixar.com (pixar.pixar.com [138.72.10.20]) by vega.netg.se with SMTP id DAA04173
> (8.6.13/IDA-1.6 for <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>); Thu, 16 May 1996 03:18:40 +0200
>Received: from ursa.cus.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA10471
> (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-devel@lists.debian.org); Wed, 15 May 1996 18:18:14 -0700
>Received: by ursa.cus.cam.ac.uk
> (Smail-3.1.29.0 #77) id m0uJrhf-000111C; Thu, 16 May 96 02:18 BST
>Resent-Sender: iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk (Ian Jackson)
>Subject: Bug#3013: elvis is too granular and has short description
>Reply-To: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>, debian-bugs@pixar.com
>Resent-From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
>Resent-To: debian-devel@pixar.com
>Resent-Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 01:18:06 GMT
>Resent-Message-Id: <debian-bugs-handler.3013.B05160117480@pixar.com>
>X-Debian-Pr-Package: elvisnox
>Received: via spool for debian-bugs; Thu, 16 May 1996 01:18:06 GMT
>Received: with rfc822 via encapsulated-mail; Thu, 16 May 1996 01:17:46 GMT
>Received: from pixar.com by mongo.pixar.com with smtp
> (Smail3.1.28.1 #15) id m0uJrgQ-0005yRC; Wed, 15 May 96 18:16 PDT
>Received: from artemis.chu.cam.ac.uk by pixar.com with SMTP id AA10435
> (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for debian-bugs-pipe@mongo.pixar.com); Wed, 15 May 1996 18:16:48 -0700
>Received: from chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk by artemis.chu.cam.ac.uk with smtp
> (Smail3.1.29.1 #33) id m0uJrgH-0007uVC; Thu, 16 May 96 02:16 BST
>Received: by chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
> id m0uJrgC-0002aPC
> (Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.35); Thu, 16 May 96 02:16 BST
>Message-Id: <m0uJrgC-0002aPC@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
>Date: Thu, 16 May 96 02:16 BST
>From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
>To: Debian bugs submission address <debian-bugs@pixar.com>
>
>Package: elvisnox
>Version: 2.0-1
>
>Firstly, it would be helpful if the elvis packages could be merged soo
>that there weren't so many of them.
>
>Secondly, the descriptions of the packages are too short: there are no
>extended descriptions.
>
>Thirdly, elviscmn should definitely not Recommend both the elvisx11
>and elvisnox packages.
>
>Ian.
>
------- end -------
Reply to: