Re: Inclusion of kernel version in kernel package names: A followup
On Wed, 15 May 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > If the argument you are strengthening is that it is a mistake to build
> > your own kernel without using lilo.conf, I disagree.
>
> Perhaps you should reread my original post.
>
> Your unmet expectations are exactly why you shouldn't mix custom
> installed kernels with debian prepackaged kernels.
>
I disagree! My only expectation in this reguard is that installing a new
image shouldn't break the old one, whether one is using lilo or not! That
is my only expectation in this reguard and I don't think that it is
unwarrented!
Later,
Dwarf
------------ --------------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: dwarf@polaris.net
------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------
Reply to: