Bug#2723: syslogd was built with bad libc
On Sat, 20 Apr 1996, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> Could anyone tell me how I could link it to libc.so.5.2.x that also
> exist on that machine? Does ld ... -lc.so.5.2.x does this?
cd /lib
ln -sf libc.so.5.2.x libc.so
then link again. ;-)
binutils 2.6 only searches for libc.so, and does't find the
different versions. normally you have a symlink from libc.so
to libc.so.5, which in turn is a symlink created by ldconfig
which always points to the latest version.
here you better let libc.so point to the 5.2.x libc.
ciao
jjm
ps: my information is from m68k-linux, so take with care.
anyway i'm very sure about this also on intel.
--
Juergen Menden | Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by me,
tel: +49 (89) 2051 - 2387 +-----------+ are (usually) not the opinions
e-mail: menden@informatik.tu-muenchen.de | of anyone else on this planet.
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Add me to your .signature and join in the fun!
Reply to: