Re: lynx
> I want to have a virtual package for web browsers, I mentioned this
> before and got no response, in the virtual packages document it says
> you shouldn't use a virtual package unless it's been approved. I want
> to use the name 'web-browser', if anyone has any objections speak now
> or I'm going to assume this is good and just use it.
I think that "nongraphical-www-browser" and "graphical-www-browser"
might be good choices for the nongraphical and graphical World Wide
Web browsers.
Jim
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lynx
- From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: lynx
- From: andrew@toaster.it.com.au (Andrew Howell)
- References:
- lynx
- From: andrew@toaster.it.com.au (Andrew Howell)