Re: lynx

[andrew@toaster.it.com.au (Andrew Howell)]

James A. Robinson writes:
> 
> 
> > I want to have a virtual package for web browsers, I mentioned this
> > before and got no response, in the virtual packages document it says
> > you shouldn't use a virtual package unless it's been approved. I want
> > to use the name 'web-browser', if anyone has any objections speak now
> > or I'm going to assume this is good and just use it.
> 
> I think that "nongraphical-www-browser" and "graphical-www-browser"
> might be good choices for the nongraphical and graphical World Wide
> Web browsers.

I don't really see that we need a graphical and non-graphical browser
virtual package. Can you think of package that would require a graphical
browser in particular?

Andrew

-- 
Dehydration - 34%, Recollection of previous evening - 2%, embarrassment
factor - 91%.  Advise repair schedule:- off line for 36 hours, re-boot
startup disk, and replace head - wow, what a night!
                -- Kryten in Red Dwarf `The Last Day'

Andrew Howell				               andrew@it.com.au 
Perth, Western Australia		      howellaa@cs.curtin.edu.au