sudo package
I'm in the process of creating a new sudo package updating it to a new
upstream version. I've already solved bugs #1162 and #1889 and will close
them. However, I don't find any bug in Bug#1875:
> From: karl@tower.com.au (Karl Ferguson)
> Package: sudo
> Version: 2.0pl1-20
Did we have a 2.0 version? The actual one is 1.3.1pl4-1.
> > Craig Sanders writes:
> >
> > >|------------------------- Message log follows: -------------------------|
> > > no valid recipients were found for this message
> > >|------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|
> > >Received: by muffin.pronet.com
> > > id <m0tHKUq-000NmCC@muffin.pronet.com>
> > > (Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.33); Mon, 20 Nov 95 11:54 EST
> > >Message-Id: <m0tHKUq-000NmCC@muffin.pronet.com>
> > >Date: Mon, 20 Nov 95 11:54 EST
> > >From: cas (Craig Sanders)
> > >To: root
> > >Subject: *** SECURITY information ***
> > >
> > >muffin : Mon Nov 20 11:54:05 : cas : user NOT in sudoers ; PWD=/home/cas ; COMMAND=/bin/cp /old/usr/lib/phone.txt /usr/lib
> > >
> > >
> I've made a bug report - it did the same on my system - bounced a message back
> to the user - definately a bug.
Where's the bug? Sudo sends its mail to user root. Such a user should exist
on every system. If the mail bounces there's a mail problem, but I cannot
see what sudo shall do differently.
I will close this bug report, too. If anyone sees a bug here, please tell
me.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Lehrstuhl fuer angewandte Mathematik insb. Informatik
RWTH-Aachen, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
email: meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de
Reply to: