Re: MSDOS name conversion
- To: debian-devel@Pixar.com
- Subject: Re: MSDOS name conversion
- From: "brian (b.c.) white" <bcwhite@bnr.ca>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 17:09:00 -0500
- Message-id: <"3094 Tue Feb 13 17:09:55 1996"@bnr.ca>
>For people without ftp access from their Debian machine, I expect it's
>quite typical that they do all their upgrades via floppies.
>
> [...]
>
>The longer I read this thread, the more I get convinced that we should
>simply stop having gigantic, unsplit packages in Debian. There's not
>really any benefit in having them, and there is obvious benefit in having
>split packages.
>
> [...]
>
See my previous comments about running "split" after the FTP is done, and
the algorithm to pack floppies efficiently.
>> Why does "split" have to work on
>> existing files? Write "split" in perl that uses "ftp.pl" and splits the
>> stream as it comes down. If you have to FTP one file at a time and then
>> copy that file to a disk, then you are already in hell. Having "split"
>> keep the transfer going while you copy it's latest output to disk could
>> only help you.
>
>Nice. Now do the same under MS-DOS. That's the sort of system I did my
>first FTPs from, several years ago. Fortunately, I had room. If I hadn't
I could. The FTP protocol is quite simple. Splitting after download is
easier, though.
>> A perl script would handle most implementations. Not to mention, which of
>> these platforms don't already have some sort of "split" program? Don't
>> tell me you're running OS/2 or NT from floppy?
>
>Why do you think OS/2 or NT *need* a "split" program? (Incidentally, at
>least OS/2 doesn't have one.)
Really? No where is there "split" for OS/2? Are you sure? I'll bet there
is pkzip for OS/2 and it should handle splitting across floppies. Of course,
you'd need "unzip" for linux, but that's available.
>> BOTTOM LINE: There are better solutions than splitting the files in the
>> distribution.
>
>BOTTOM LINE: You certainly didn't show any solution I would not call a
> *lot* worse.
Why is a simple DOS program that splits FTP'd package files optimally among
many floppies a *lot* worse? Why is it worse at all?
Brian
( bcwhite@bnr.ca )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
Reply to: