Bug#2307: xpm4.7 has no Maintainer field
> Yes---as I understand it, the package name should reflect the soname
> of the shared library (4.7) so we can have multiple versions
> installed, while the version name reflects the upstream version
> (3.4g).
reflect the soname why? How many versions will be installed, is this
required optional, desirable? Isn't symlinking enough? If you need
multiple versions, are shared libraries space savers or consumers.?
--
Erick Branderhorst@heel.fgg.eur.nl +31-10-4635142
Department of General Surgery (Intensive Care) University Hospital Rotterdam NL
Reply to: